A federal judge refuses to block a state-ordered indoor dining and drinking "pause" for pandemic safety.
U.S. District Judge Paul Maloney of Grand Rapids on Wednesday denies an injunction requested Nov. 17 by the Michigan Restaurant and Lodging Association, the Detroit Free Press says. He held a hearing Monday in Kalamazoo
The ruling is another blow to Michigan's restaurant industry. ... The state's current "three-week pause" in indoor dining is effective through Dec. 8. ...
During Monday's hearing, an attorney for the Michigan Restaurant & Lodging Association told Maloney that the restaurant industry in Michigan is on the verge of collapse and can't survive another extended shutdown. ... Kelli Mulder, an attorney for the MRLA, said ... 2,000 restaurants permanently closed in the state already and 250,000 jobs have been lost.
Arguing on behalf of the state health department, which issued the epidemic order that took effect Nov. 18, Assistant Attorney General Neil Giovanatti said Michigan hospitals are severely strained by surging Covid cases as infections hit record levels statewide.
In court documents, Susan Selasky of the Freep posts, the state cites research showing restaurants have a larger role than other places as Covid spreaders -- "four times riskier than gyms and coffee shops, followed by hotels."
Bars and restaurants ranked higher than social gatherings, colleges, retail stores and personal services, such as nail and hair salons, spas and gyms.
The Department of Health and Human Services may extend the statewide ban beyond next week if coronavirus diagnoses remain alarmingly high, or could tailor it to cover only hardest-hit regions.
The restaurant group's leader, Justin Winslow, reacts ina statement:
"While we are disappointed with today’s ruling, it is important to note what Judge Maloney explicitly acknowledged in his ruling, stating that 'Michigan restaurants are at risk of, or have already suffered, irreparable harm" under the health director's order.
"It is in that vein that we will now transition our efforts to preventing an extension of the MDHHS order beyond Dec. 8 and call on Director [Robert] Gordon to provide clear and specific data to justify the sustained closure of restaurants across the state."
Earlier coverage, Nov. 20:
A federal judge denies a restaurant trade group's request for an immediate halt to the Whitmer administration's new ban on inside dining and drinking, The Detroit News says.
Judge Paul Maloney, who was appointed by Republican President George W. Bush, ruled Friday [in Grand Rapids] that the business group is unlikely to succeed in their claims and denied its request for a temporary restraining order.
He set a hearing for Nov. 30 to hear arguments from the Michigan Restaurant and Lodging Association and the attorney general's office, on behalf of the Department of Health and Human Services.
Justin Winslow, head of the Lansing industry group, says: "More restaurant workers will be losing their jobs in the coming days as restaurants remain closed." A brief statement adds that the association is "hopeful for a positive outcome that more effectively balances risk and human toll across Michigan."
Winslow tells The News that many members expect to be shut at least six to eight weeks as the epidemic order is likely extened past Dec. 9.
Original article, Tuesday:
The Michigan Restaurant & Lodging Association filed a federal lawsuit Tuesday in an attempt to overturn the state's ban on indoor dining in restaurants that takes effect Wednesday and runs at least through Dec. 9.
"We made several good-faith efforts in advance of the public release of the order issued November 15 to reach a compromise with the (state health department) that would have supported the goal of minimizing risk while still allowing for the continued operation of dining rooms," the association said in a press release.
The case filed in U.S. District Court in Grand Rapids seeks an emergency preliminary injunction to allow indoor dining while following safety protocols.
It claims Gov. Gretchen Whitmer's administration violated the businesses' right to equal protection under the law. New rules allegedly target bars and restaurants unfairly because they spare other nonessential businesses operating indoors. "Inexplicably" restaurants and bars have not been given option to remain open even though they have demonstrated they can operate safely, the suit says.
It also says the state Department of Health and Human Services' epidemic order violates the state Constitution's separation of powers and nondelegation clauses. The Republican-majority legislature complained after the latest order that it did not have a say.
The editor-in-chief of Michigan Advance, a Lansing-based news site, tweets a pointed reaction:
The Michigan Restaurant Association could lobby Congress for a covid relief bill but the headlines are better suing the state because apparently not enough people have died yet. What an abject moral failure.— Susan J. Demas (@sjdemas) November 17, 2020
Ali Kasben, managing editor of Gongwer, a subscription news service in the capital, tweets that until now the association "has been level-headed in responding to Covid restrictions from the administration."